|
The “true” story of Charlie Wilson (Hanks) is an easy, albeit interesting, tale to tell. A congressman from Texas known for his interest in women chasing and good Scotch rather than his leadership qualities or political ambition. In the early 80’s that quickly changes after meeting with a wealthy Texas oil woman (Roberts) who wants to help him defeat the Communist Russians invading Afghanistan, thereby effectively taking another step in winning the cold war. After a trip to the Afghan refugee camp, his ambition takes over and he’ll stop at nothing to appropriate funds and gain support in running a covert war against the Russians. Enter Phillip Seymour Hoffman in his hat-trick performance of 2007. Hoffman plays Gust Avrakotos, a hard talking and brash CIA operative who is so good at his job that he has trouble finding work since he’s so incredibly covert and hard nosed. After walking away from his superior in an unusually harsh manner, he hooks up with two other secret agents to analyze and interpret how to fight a war against the Russians if they just had the money and supplies. Inevitably, this group meets with Wilson and so begins the real meat of the story: how to fight a war against a super-power, but make sure no one knows about it.
The story takes some time in getting started. Nichols really takes his time setting up who these characters are and the scenario in which we’ll find them. It’s not exactly boring, but it does seem to drag just a bit; however necessary as it is. But as I said, this film does stand on pretty solid ground. Once the story gets to it’s meatier sections, it’s a fairly interesting tale about some American foreign relations history that I only had a vague understanding of.
The performances are, as expected, top notch. While Hanks has been doing some fairly mediocre work in the past few years, he finally gets back on track here with a decent role and in a lesser year, possibly Oscar worthy. While Roberts adds a big name to the cast list, she’s not really in the film all that much to be worthy of much comment (she does look darn nice though). Then there’s Amy Adams, who’s got a fairly minimal role in this picture, but is just on the cusp of reaching full-blown super-stardom and it’s easy to see why when she delivers as well as she does even in smaller, though still important, roles. The screen stealer here is, not surprisingly, Phillip Seymour Hoffman. His sleazy look and vocal qualities along with his harsh, dry wit captures our attention just about every second he’s on screen. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that Hoffman will be up for an Oscar this year. The question is, for which of his three roles will it be? Each is excellent and worthy of such recognition.
As much as there is to praise about the film and very little to fault it for, it will mostly go the way of the forgotten. It will likely see a performance or two nominated at the Oscars and maybe some screenplay love, but without a best picture nod, no one will talk about this film again six months from now; which is a real shame, because it has a lot going for it. Although I must admit, as much as I liked it, its re-watch value is curiously low. The caliber of the talent involved raises the bar a bit as far as expectations go; and the time of year that it’s been released is a bit of a head-scratcher. Still, as far as adult-oriented dramas with a smart script go, you’re going to be hard pressed to find much better right now than Charlie Wilson. The Hoffman performance alone makes this virtually a must-see for any Oscar afficionados.
Links: IMDb profile - full cast and crew Official Site Flixster Profile for Charlie Wilson's War
andrew@moviepatron.com | |||||||
reviewed by Andrew James
In the start, I was a little nervous that the movie might get a bit too much into the politically preachy realm and while there is a tiny bit of that, it really treads nicely on this potentially thin ice. Nichols uses a master stroke and gives a political film without being too political. With that being said, the film’s message is obvious and relevant. What we do that might seem like a good idea in the short run, might come back to bite us in the future if not carefully nurtured. I’ve actually been thinking about it quite a fair bit in the past 12 hours and think the film is full of important messages; ironically enough, some of them conflicting with one another (such is the case in the complicated world of covert operations and foreign relations).
